Response on discussion on the Qult – Grover, CAF, Farrell
This is the discussion
Here is Grover’s latest article with a list of his other work at the end.
RESPONSE TO anon1 on October 14, 2020 · at 4:42 am EST/EDT
Quote: With all due respect, I am wondering about the rational behind prohibiting comments here on the theme discussed by Catherine Fitts and Joseph Farrell, and to directing anyone who may wish to express any thoughts , to the Saker Community blog. This has been attempted before, and failed..
Just a thought, we all know that what is forbidden increases in fascination, or gains power, but for hidden reasons, this has to be directed into a community project with an ID control ethos.?
Mental conditioning as a theme per se, is something of the greatest possible current relevance, and has been discussed on here many times, included in poems, links and videos, if one has the time to research the archives one can find examples.
Also discussed many times, is the conviction of the individuals right and necessity to draw their own conclusions, do their own research, and undertake any process they feel incumbent upon them to fully understand any given issue. Knowledge is growth. END QUOTE
Let’s get it clear. I have answered this to you before.
Yes, here you have to register and log-in and take responsibility under a name.
You may discuss your research and conclusions on this topic here. On the Saker Blog he does not want this conversation to take place. Convince me otherwise but try and use logic and not qult memes.
- This reply was modified 3 months, 1 week ago by amarynth.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.